| |
Why should we not consider as feasible to object
of creating a built environment in Wales that is as synonymous with good
design as the architecture of the Scandinavian countries? |
P A U L   V A N N E R
Democratising Design

If any form of Welsh design commission is to have any chance of long term
survival it will have to address three key issues. These are
- The need to de-mystify
the design process
- The democratisation
of the design process
- The development
of education and professional training
De-mystifying design
The favoured "black box/creative architectural leap" is an elitist
and arrogant interpretation of the design process. It simply distances
designers from their end users and serves to create the pretence of a
superiority that avoids dialogue with those who use and "consume"
buildings and public spaces. While the creative design process is something
to be valued, the skills of designers, architects, urban designers and
planners should not be buried and submerged but debated and considered
by end users.
However, neither the general school curriculum nor the
higher education system encourage any erosion of the professional power
earned through six or more years of study. I believe that good design
in the public realm will only come when we have procedures in place that
encourage public dialogue and an understanding of the benefits to be derived
from good design. And by "dialogue" I do not mean the traditional
public consultation meeting - where members of the public sit in a draughty
church hall with professionals sitting on a stage surrounded by plans
and sections that are unintelligible to the average citizen.
Democratising design
We need to encourage democratisation of the design process. This is an
issue that a Welsh design commission must tackle. It should not simply
replicate the example of the Commission for Architecture and the Built
Environment - which appears to have inherited some of the perspectives
of the old Royal Fine Arts Commission - but offer its own distinctive
and comprehensive solution. It should be both radical and inclusive.
We must empower the public to contribute to the debate.
This is not something that can be achieved overnight, but alongside change
in school curricula, and other actions that promote a change in cultural
attitudes and aspirations there are a number of short-term actions that
a design commission could consider.
Education and professional
training
This is a long-standing personal hobbyhorse! My belief is that unless
there is some common thread to environmental training and comprehensive
understanding of the economics and power of development, we will rarely
arrive at sustainable solutions and user-friendly environments.
Architecture centres are one possibility, a means to
display models, drawings and planning applications, as well a platform
for exhibitions and events, or a source of support for schools and adult
education initiatives.
Education in schools is another issue. I would like
to see a team of architecture and design advisors appointed to lead environmental
education in schools, and producing resources for use in and outside the
classroom.
Thirdly, we need to ensure that when the Assembly deals
with the public and private sectors design is always on the agenda. The
Assembly needs design and architectural advisors, not to replicate the
old RFAC or the Cardiff Bay Design Panel but to ensure that design considerations
are part of every decision emanating from the Assembly.
There are other ways to engage the public and democratise
the design process. At a simple level we might require that all planning
applications are displayed on site and contain explanations of their design
rationale and details of where the proposed might be viewed.
More ambitiously, information technology offers enormous
opportunities. The internet extends the chance to provide access to design
resources and information, including examples of what good design can
achieve, materials on building technologies and sustainability, interactive
fora that engage the public in live debate. A Welsh design web site should
cover all the design disciplines - architecture, urban design, landscape,
infrastructure, planning and conservation.
These thoughts are modest, but the goal is not.
Why should we not consider as feasible the object of
creating a built environment in Wales that is as synonymous with good
design as the architecture of some of the Scandinavian countries? Perhaps
one of the first tasks for a design commission would be the creation of
- not another design guide - but a design primer that illustrates how
other distinctive regions of Europe have over the years retained and developed
a national design identity. We inhabit a small and geographically diverse
nation that proudly embraces its own language, culture and institutions.
We have a turbulent history and a strong social heritage; we have diverse
and distinctive natural and man-made landscapes. We should certainly look
at other countries that have developed distinctive and culturally rich
built environments - Finland or Slovenia, Denmark or Holland. These are
places where re-emergent national self-consciousness has gone hand in
hand with cultural confidence - demonstrated by the recognition of architects
such as Asplund, Aalto and Plecnik.
Can we in Wales develop a design strategy that draws
on the wellsprings of national identity? Can we discover confident and
radical design solutions that embrace national characteristics and art
and craft traditions without slavishly following design exemplars?
And at the same time we should not be seduced into thinking
that design is a purely visual experience. Our overriding goal as designers
should be to improve peoples' quality of life and their opportunities
for good and healthy living. Design is not a stand-alone quality, and
what makes good or bad design remains a subjective opinion unless there
has been a clear statement of what a design is trying to achieve, why
it is necessary and how these criteria are to be fulfilled. Performance
needs to be measured against objectives.
Design is a means to an end; and if this is to enlighten,
improve and inspire people the question of design quality must engage
the user and the consumer. The public duty of design professionals is
to develop the skills and techniques that engage the end user in meaningful
debate.
This essay first appeared in the Trust's magazine, About
Wales, in January 2001
|